49 • GeneralCity of Mesquite (Dallas County)

Pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, the City Council will meet in closed session to conduct a private consultation with its attorney related to pending or contemplated litigation, a settlement offer, and/or a matter in which there exists a duty of the City Attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas th

Presented in: City of Mesquite City Council on 2026-10-05

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact

PASSED (7 - 0)

“Motion to approve Pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, the City Council will meet in closed session to conduct a private consultation with its attorney related to pending or contemplated litigation, a settlement offer, and/or a matter in which there exists a duty of the City Attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas th”

Daniel Alemán, Jr.

Mayor (At-Large)

YES

Jeff Casper

Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)

YES

Kenny Green

Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)

YES

Elizabeth Rodriguez-Ross

Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)

YES

Andrew Hubacek

Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)

YES

B.W. Smith

Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)

YES

Brandon Murden

Councilmember, Place 6 (Place 6)

YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, the City Council will meet in closed session to conduct a private consultation with its attorney related to pending or contemplated litigation, a settlement offer, and/or a matter in which there exists a duty of the City Attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas that conflicts with Texas Government Code Chapter 551. The following subjects may be discussed:

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.