YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
IX.M • Action ItemsFLORENCE ISD (Williamson County)

Consideration and Possible Action to Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Florence for the School Resource Officers for the 2026-2027 School Year Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: The cost to provide one SRO on each campus has remained unchanged since last year. The total cost is $234,968.07, up from $205,822.76 due to more experienced officers and raises. The SRO progra

Presented in: FLORENCE ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-08-17
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.9/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on Consideration and Possible Action to Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Florence for the School Resource Officers for the 2026-2027 School Year Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Descri”
AD
Anthony Deaugustineo
Trustee, Place 5
YES
CG
Charles Giddens
Trustee, Place 6
YES
JS
Jeff Stone
Trustee, Place 7
YES
EN
Ed Navarette
Trustee, Place 1
YES
JA
Jt Atkinson
Trustee, Place 2
YES
JE
Jason Earp
Trustee, Place 3
YES
PB
Pete Burson
Trustee, Place 4
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

IX.M. Consideration and Possible Action to Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Florence for the School Resource Officers for the 2026-2027 School Year Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: The cost to provide one SRO on each campus has remained unchanged since last year. The total cost is $234,968.07, up from $205,822.76 due to more experienced officers and raises. The SRO program has been very successful since implemented and meets the requirements in statute of having an armed peace officer on campus when students are present during the school day. Attachments: ( 1 ) SRO Memorandum of Understanding 2026-2027 8/12/2026 at 7:06 AM

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.9/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).