YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
116 • RegularCity of Granbury (Hood County)

W. Bridge Street, Granbury, Texas

Presented in: Planning & Zoning Commission on 2026-10-05
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.7/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Motion to approve W. Bridge Street, Granbury, Texas”
JJ
YES
GC
Greg Corrigan
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
AP
Angela Parker
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
BW
Bruce Wadley
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
SO
Skip Overdier
Councilmember, Place 4
YES
ZU
Zeb Ullom
Councilmember, Place 5
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

WATCH THE MEETING LIVE: www.granbury.org/live § 551.071. Consultation with Attorney. The Planning and Zoning Commission may convene in executive session to conduct a private consultation with its attorney on any legally posted agenda item, when the Planning and Zoning Commission seeks the advice of its attorney about pending or contemplated litigation, a settlement offer, or on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with the provisions of Chapter 551. Notice posted on the 29th day of September, 2026 on the City Hall bulletin board at 116 West Bridge Street, Granbury, Texas and the City website (www.granbury.org) by 5:00 p.m. Granbury City Hall is wheelchair accessible and entry ramps are located on all sides of the building. If you plan to attend this public meeting and you have a disability that requires special arrangements at the meeting, please contact the City Secretary’s Office, at 817-573-1114 within 48 business hours of the scheduled meeting date. Reasonable accommodations will be made to assist your needs.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.7/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).