YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
IX.H • Action ItemsFLORENCE ISD (Williamson County)

Consideration and Possible Action to Approve the Florence ISD Board of Trustees Advocacy Agenda for the 90th Texas Legislative Session Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: The recommended advocacy agenda is attached for discussion and review. After being trained by the Texas Association of Rural Schools, instead of creating a bullet list, I tried to tell the story behind the request and how it

Presented in: FLORENCE ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-08-17
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.8/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on Consideration and Possible Action to Approve the Florence ISD Board of Trustees Advocacy Agenda for the 90th Texas Legislative Session Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: The recommended advocacy”
AD
Anthony Deaugustineo
Trustee, Place 5
YES
CG
Charles Giddens
Trustee, Place 6
YES
JS
Jeff Stone
Trustee, Place 7
YES
EN
Ed Navarette
Trustee, Place 1
YES
JA
Jt Atkinson
Trustee, Place 2
YES
JE
Jason Earp
Trustee, Place 3
YES
PB
Pete Burson
Trustee, Place 4
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

IX.H. Consideration and Possible Action to Approve the Florence ISD Board of Trustees Advocacy Agenda for the 90th Texas Legislative Session Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: The recommended advocacy agenda is attached for discussion and review. After being trained by the Texas Association of Rural Schools, instead of creating a bullet list, I tried to tell the story behind the request and how it could impact Florence ISD and rural school districts. If approved, I will create a one-pager for clarity. Attachments: ( 1 ) Legislative Priorities 8/17/2026 at 10:21 AM

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.8/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).