Back to Docket Search
5. • OrdinanceCity of Roanoke (Denton County)
Consideration and action on a request by Cody Dishman, on behalf of Three Ten Oak LLC, for a proposed attached blade sign that exceeds the size allowed per section 12.497 of the City of Roanoke Zoning Ordinance to be located on the west facade of building located at 310 S. Oak Street, Roanoke, Texas.
Presented in: 08/11/2026 City Council Meeting on 2026-08-11
Official Roll-Call Vote
Expands Gov't • 7.2/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Motion to approve Consideration and action on a request by Cody Dishman, on behalf of Three Ten Oak LLC, for a proposed attached blade sign that exceeds the size allowed per section 12.497 of the City of Roanoke Zoning”
CE
YES
HG
Holly Gray-Moore
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JP
John Pullen
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
BD
Brian Darby
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
DB
David Brundage
Councilmember, Place 4
YES
DT
David Thompson
Councilmember, Place 5
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Consideration and action on a request by Cody Dishman, on behalf of Three Ten Oak LLC, for a proposed attached blade sign that exceeds the size allowed per section 12.497 of the City of Roanoke Zoning Ordinance to be located on the west facade of building located at 310 S. Oak Street, Roanoke, Texas.
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.2/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).