20 • CONSENT AGENDAThe Consent Agenda includes non-contWilliamson County (Williamson County)

Discuss, consider, and take appropriate action on authorizing the Purchasing Agent to advertise and receive competitively sealed proposals for a contractor for Brushy Creek Trail Retaining Wall RFCSP, under #26RFCSP85, designating Eckermann Engineering, Inc for Architectural/ Engineering services and assigning the price criteria a weighted value of not less than 36.9 percent of the total weighted

Presented in: Williamson County Commissioners Court - October 06, 2026 on 2026-10-06

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact

PASSED (5 - 0)

“Discuss, consider, and take appropriate action on authorizing the Purchasing Agent to advertise and receive competitively sealed proposals for a contractor for Brushy Creek Trail Retaining Wall RFCSP, under #26RFCSP85, designating Eckermann Engineering, Inc for Architectural/ Engineering services and assigning the price criteria a weighted value of not less than 36.9 percent of the total weighted”

Steven Snell

County Judge

YES

Cynthia Long

Commissioner, Precinct 2 (Precinct 2)

YES

Russ Boles

Commissioner, Precinct 4 (Precinct 4)

YES

Valerie Covey

Commissioner, Precinct 3 (Precinct 3)

YES

Terry Cook

Commissioner, Precinct 1 (Precinct 1)

YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Discuss, consider, and take appropriate action on authorizing the Purchasing Agent to advertise and receive competitively sealed proposals for a contractor for Brushy Creek Trail Retaining Wall RFCSP, under #26RFCSP85, designating Eckermann Engineering, Inc for Architectural/ Engineering services and assigning the price criteria a weighted value of not less than 36.9 percent of the total weighted value of all selection criteria. (Funding source is 01.0100.0509.004509).

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.