YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
9.f • Action ItemsLUBBOCK-COOPER ISD (Lubbock County)

Consider and possible approval of Resolution to conduct a joint election on May 2, 2026, with all cities and schools with territory inside Lubbock County that may require a May 2, 2026, election. Tomar en consideración y posiblemente aprobar la Resolución para llevar a cabo una elección conjunta el 2 de mayo de 2026, con todas las ciudades y escuelas con territorio dentro del Condado de Lubbock qu

Presented in: LUBBOCK-COOPER ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-01-15
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on Consider and possible approval of Resolution to conduct a joint election on May 2, 2026, with all cities and schools with territory inside Lubbock County that may require a May 2, 2026, election. Toma”
CM
Colby Miller
Trustee, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
BP
Brent Preston
Trustee, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES
AP
Amy Punchard
Trustee, Place 7 (Place 7)
YES
PE
Paul Ehlers
Trustee, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
DC
Daniel Castro
Trustee, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
UC
Ursula Caswell
Trustee, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
BL
Bj Lewis
Trustee, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

9.f. Consider and possible approval of Resolution to conduct a joint election on May 2, 2026, with all cities and schools with territory inside Lubbock County that may require a May 2, 2026, election. Tomar en consideración y posiblemente aprobar la Resolución para llevar a cabo una elección conjunta el 2 de mayo de 2026, con todas las ciudades y escuelas con territorio dentro del Condado de Lubbock que puedan requerir una elección el 2 de mayo de 2026.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).