YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
d. • Consent AgendaCity of San Angelo (Tom Green County)

Consider awarding WU-05-26 Rebid Liquid Ammonium Sulfate to Veolia ES Technical Solutions in the amount of $337,500 annually for 1-year with four 1-year extensions, and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute all related documents (Danielle Rix)

Presented in: City of San Angelo City Council Meeting on 2026-09-01
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve Consider awarding WU-05-26 Rebid Liquid Ammonium Sulfate to Veolia ES Technical Solutions in the amount of $337,500 annually for 1-year with four 1-year extensions, and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute all related documents (Danielle Rix)”
TT
Tom Thompson
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
TH
Tommy Hiebert
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
JS
Joe Self
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
HT
Harry Thomas
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
PK
Patrick Keely
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
KH
Karen Hesse Smith
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
MC
Mary Coffey
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

The City of San Angelo Water Utilities Department recently requested rebids for the chemical purchase of Liquid Ammonium Sulfate for the Water Production Plant for use in the treatment of potable water. The respondents were also to meet certain specifications and delivery requirements. The previous bid for this chemical purchase was rejected due to the low bid coming in higher than anticipated.<br><br>The City received three bids. The bid from Baker Services was bid using incorrect measures and was therefore void.  Of the remaining two bids that did meet all criteria, the bid from Veoila ES Technical Solutions was the lowest.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.