YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
6 • Public HearingCity of Saginaw (Tarrant County)

PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration and Action regarding Ordinance No. 2021-24, Creation of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone containing approximately 295.44 acres of noncontiguous land generally located north of Bailey Boswell Road, North of McLeroy Blvd. and West of Saginaw Blvd., and being wholly located within the Corporate Limits of the City of Saginaw

Presented in: City of Saginaw City Council on 2021-11-02
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration and Action regarding Ordinance No. 2021-24, Creation of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone containing approximately 295.44 acres of noncontiguous land generally located nor”
TF
Todd Flippo
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PF
Paul Felegy
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
NL
Nicky Lawson
Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
VJ
Valerie Junkersfeld
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
BS
Brack St. Clair
Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
SM
Shawn Morrison
Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
MC
Mary Copeland
Councilmember, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration and Action regarding Ordinance No. 2021-24, Creation of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone containing approximately 295.44 acres of noncontiguous land generally located north of Bailey Boswell Road, North of McLeroy Blvd. and West of Saginaw Blvd., and being wholly located within the Corporate Limits of the City of Saginaw (Presenter: Gabe Reaume, City Manager)

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).