YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
18 • Action ItemsCity of Breckenridge (Stephens County)

Discussion and direction regarding the upcoming FY 2026-2027 Budget and Strategic Plan review RECEIVE REQUESTS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS/STAFF FOR ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON NEXT MEETING AGENDA Discussion under this section must be limited to whether or not the Commission wishes to include a

Presented in: City of Breckenridge Governing Body Meeting on 2026-04-07
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.1/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve Discussion and direction regarding the upcoming FY 2026-2027 Budget and Strategic Plan review RECEIVE REQUESTS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS/STAFF FOR ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON NEXT MEETING AGENDA Discussion un”
KT
YES
BH
Blake Hamilton
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JR
Justin Rose
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
JF
Junior Fernandez
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
PH
Paul Huntington, Jr.
Councilmember, Place 4
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

potential item on a future agenda. ADJOURN NOTE: As authorized by Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code (Consultation with City Attorney), this meeting may be convened into closed Executive Session for the purpose of seeking confidential legal advice from the City Attorney on any agenda item herein. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above notice was posted in the bulletin board at Breckenridge City Hall, 105 North Rose Avenue, Breckenridge, Texas ,on the 31st day of March 2026. City Secretary Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this public meeting and who may need auxiliary aid or services are requested to contact the Breckenridge City Hall 48 hours in advance, at 254-559- 8287, and reasonable accommodations will be made for assistance.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.1/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).