YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
6 • REGULARMontgomery County Municipal Utility District #95 (Montgomery County)

7 MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO

Presented in: Montgomery County MUD #95 Board of Directors Meeting on 2025-05-14
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 2.3/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Motion to approve 7 MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO”
AH
Asa Hoffman
President
YES
KR
Kari Romano
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
DP
Debbie Pilcher
Director, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
JS
Jack Seitzinger
Director, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
ME
Martin Etwop
Director, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
RS
Ray Schmidt
Director, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

7 MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 95 NOTICE OF SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given to all interested members of the public that the Board of Directors ofthe above-captioned District will hold its public meeting at South Village Recreational Center, 10060 Preserve W"y, Conroe, TX 77385, said address being meeting place of the District. The meeting will be held on Wednesdav. MaY 14. 2025. at 12:00 Noon. The Board shall consider and discuss the following maffers and take any action appropriate with respect to such matters: Introduction of Board and consultants; public comments; Review and approve the minutes of the Board of Directors meeting held April 9,2025; Bookkeeper Report, including financial and investment reports, ffid authorizing the payment of invoices presented; Approval of Unclaimed Property Reports as of March t,2025, and authorize bookkeeper and tax assessor to file Reports with State Comptroller prior to July 1,2025; Tax Assessor-Collector Report,

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.3/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.