YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
3D • Work SessionCity of Rowlett (Dallas County)

Receive a presentation and update regarding amendments to the Code of Ordinances, Article IV "Regulation of Sex Offender Residency" Ordinance Chapter 34 by amending Section 34.71.

Presented in: City of Rowlett City Council Work Session Training on 2026-08-03
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 7.3/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve Receive a presentation and update regarding amendments to the Code of Ordinances, Article IV "Regulation of Sex Offender Residency" Ordinance Chapter 34 by amending Section 34.71.”
JW
Jeff Winget
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
CK
Chris Kizziar
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
MG
Marvin Gibbs
Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
BF
Byron Fassett
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
MB
Mike Britton
Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
CH
Carter Holston
Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
JP
John P. Bowers III
Councilmember, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

The City currently enforces a prohibition that restricts certain registered sex offenders from residing within 1,000 feet of locations where children commonly gather. These locations include, but are not limited to schools, parks, arcades, recreational facilities, daycares, and similar uses. The purpose is to enhance public safety by reducing the chances that repeat sexual offenders can harm others, especially children. This amendment aims to partner with property renters, deter future crimes, and protect vulnerable individuals by increasing awareness and oversight.<br data-pasted="true"><p style="margin-left:0in;"><br></p>

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.3/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.