YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
14 • Action ItemsCity of Breckenridge (Stephens County)

Discussion and any necessary action regarding approval of Resolution 2025-08 canceling the approved replat to the property known as 105 N. Rose (legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, and East Helf of Lot 4, Block 7, Original Town of Breckenridge) and property known as 317 W.

Presented in: City of Breckenridge Governing Body Meeting on 2025-05-06
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.2/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve Discussion and any necessary action regarding approval of Resolution 2025-08 canceling the approved replat to the property known as 105 N. Rose (legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, and East Helf of Lot”
KT
YES
BH
Blake Hamilton
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JR
Justin Rose
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
JF
Junior Fernandez
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
PH
Paul Huntington, Jr.
Councilmember, Place 4
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Elm, (legally described as Lots 5, 6 and the West half of Lot 4, Block 7, Original Town of Breckenridge).

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.2/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).