YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
11. • ConsentCity of Austin (Travis County)

Approve an ordinance suspending a rate increase proposed by SiEnergy Gas, LLC, for natural gas services; approving the City’s participation in a coalition, including participation in proceedings related to the proposed rate increase at the Railroad Commission of Texas; requiring reimbursement of the municipal rate case expenses; and providing notice to SiEnergy Gas, LLC. Funding: This item has no fiscal Impact.

Presented in: City of Austin City Council on 2026-05-28
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (11 - 0)
“Motion to approve Approve an ordinance suspending a rate increase proposed by SiEnergy Gas, LLC, for natural gas services; approving the City’s participation in a coalition, including participation in proceedings relat”
ZQ
Zohaib Qadri
Councilmember, District 9
YES
MD
Marc Duchen
Councilmember, District 10
YES
PE
Paige Ellis
Councilmember, District 8
YES
KL
Krista Laine
Councilmember, District 6
YES
VF
Vanessa Fuentes
Councilmember, District 2
YES
JV
José Velásquez
Councilmember, District 3
YES
NH
Natasha Harper-Madison
Councilmember, District 1
YES
RA
Ryan Alter
Councilmember, District 5
YES
MS
Mike Siegel
Councilmember, District 7
YES
J"
José "Chito" Vela
Councilmember, District 4
YES
KW
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Approve an ordinance suspending a rate increase proposed by SiEnergy Gas, LLC, for natural gas services; approving the City’s participation in a coalition, including participation in proceedings related to the proposed rate increase at the Railroad Commission of Texas; requiring reimbursement of the municipal rate case expenses; and providing notice to SiEnergy Gas, LLC. Funding: This item has no fiscal Impact.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.