YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
3. • ACTION ITEMSCity of Watauga (Tarrant County)

Discuss and consider action to approve the proposed revisions to sections 4.09, and 11.44 of the City of Watauga Firefighters' and Police Officers' Civil Service Rules and Regulations.

Presented in: City of Watauga Civil Service Commission Meeting on 2026-08-13
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 2.7/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (8 - 0)
“Motion to approve Discuss and consider action to approve the proposed revisions to sections 4.09, and 11.44 of the City of Watauga Firefighters' and Police Officers' Civil Service Rules and Regulations.”
AL
Arthur L. Miner
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PS
Patrick Shelbourne
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
CB
Cris Blackburn
Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
LD
Lovie Downey
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
AN
Andrew Neal
Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
SW
Stephen Welch
Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
MT
Mark Taylor
Councilmember, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES
JH
Jan Hill
Councilmember, Place 7 (Place 7)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

The Watauga Police Department Command Staff is requesting approval to revise the City of Watauga Firefighters’ and Police Officers’ Civil Service Rules and Regulations, specifically Sections 4.09 and 11.44.<br><br><strong>Chapter 4 – Entrance Examinations and Original Appointment, Section 4.09 – Police Department Eligibility Standards:</strong><br>The Watauga Police Department is requesting revisions to the drug-use eligibility standards to more closely align with the standards currently applicable to the Watauga Fire Department. The proposed revisions are intended to establish greater consistency between the City’s public safety hiring standards and provide additional flexibility in the recruitment and selection of qualified police officer candidates.<br><strong>Chapter 11 – Disciplinary Actions, Section 11.44 – Exchange of Documents and Identity of Witnesses:</strong><br>The proposed revision would clarify the requirements for the exchange of exhibits and identification of potential witnesses prior to an appeal hearing. The revision is intended to establish clear expectations regarding the timely exchange of hearing materials and witness information and to reduce the need for subpoenas when documents and witnesses can be identified and exchanged in advance.<br><br>

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.7/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.