YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
b. • Consent AgendaCity of San Angelo (Tom Green County)

Second reading of an ordinance amending the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2025, and ending September 30, 2026, for Health Insurance claims and premiums (Jonathan Flores)

Presented in: City of San Angelo City Council Meeting on 2026-08-18
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve Second reading of an ordinance amending the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2025, and ending September 30, 2026, for Health Insurance claims and premiums (Jonathan Flores)”
TT
Tom Thompson
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
TH
Tommy Hiebert
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
JS
Joe Self
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
HT
Harry Thomas
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
PK
Patrick Keely
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
KH
Karen Hesse Smith
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
MC
Mary Coffey
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

This proposed amendment contains the following items (additional information attached):<br><br>Budget for additional city-contributed health insurance premium revenue and related health claims expenses in FY26. This amendment will increase contributions to Health Insurance fund due to rising retiree premiums and excessive claims activity. Additional contributions are needed to fund health insurance claims in fiscal year 2026. These additional contributions should give health insurance enough funds to make payments through the end of the year. The costs for insurance claims are being allocated based on FTEs to fund the additional costs. This amendment also makes adjustments to over 65 retiree premiums based on the differential of the new plan amounts.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.