YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
9 • REGULARMontgomery County Municipal Utility District #148 (Montgomery County)

Hear Attomey's report and consider taking any action requested, incl0ding: a) Adopt Resolution Concerning Tax Exemptions for 2025; b) Confirm engag...

Presented in: Montgomery County MUD #148 Board of Directors Meeting on 2025-01-15
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 2.7/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve Hear Attomey's report and consider taking any action requested, incl0ding: a) Adopt Resolution Concerning Tax Exemptions for 2025; b) Confirm engag...”
JV
Joey Vincent
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
PE
Penny Evans
Director, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
RS
Robin Secrest
Director, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
RR
Richard Rankin
Director, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
JH
John Healy
Director, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Hear Attomey's report and consider taking any action requested, incl0ding: a) Adopt Resolution Concerning Tax Exemptions for 2025; b) Confirm engagement of Coats Rose, P.C., as Delinquent Tax Attorney; and c) Adopt Resolution Implementing20% Penalty on 2024 Delinquent Taxes. Pursuant to V.T.C"A. Government Code, Chapter 551, as amended, the Board of Directors may convene in closed session to discuss matters relating to pending or contemplated litigation, personnel matters, or real estate transactions. Pursuant to Section 49.062, Texas Water Code, a written request of at least five registered voters may be submitted to the Board of Directors requesting the Board of Directors to designate a meeting place within the District. If no suitable meeting place exists inside the District, the Board may designate a meeting place outside the District that is located not further than l0 miles from the boundary of the District. If the Board of Directors fails to designate a meeting place within the

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.7/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.