YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
13 • REGULARHarris County Municipal Utility District #154 (Harris County)

Discuss next meeting date (July 23, 2026); and such other matters that may come before the Board

Presented in: Harris County MUD #154 Board of Directors Meeting on 2026-06-25
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 2.4/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve Discuss next meeting date (July 23, 2026); and such other matters that may come before the Board”
WJ
Wanda Joshlin
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
JM
Judy Madison
Director, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
JL
John Lavallais
Director, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
DO
David Ortiz
Director, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
EG
Eugene Gutierrez
Director, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Discuss next meeting date (July 23, 2026); and such other matters that may come before the Board. /s/ Reginald Wilson Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP Attorneys for District If, during the course of the meeting covered by this Notice, the Board should determine that a closed or executive session of the Board should be held or is required in relation to any agenda item included in this Notice, then such closed or executive meeting or session, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act, will be held by the Board at the date, hour, and place given in this Notice concerning any and all subjects for any and all purposes permitted by Sections 551.071-551.084 of the Texas Government Code and the Texas Open Meetings Act, including, but not limited to, Section 551.071 - for the purpose of a private consultation with the Board’s attorney on any or all subjects or matters authorized by law.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.4/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.