YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
10 • REGULARMontgomery County Municipal Utility District #121 (Montgomery County)

Report on development in the District

Presented in: Montgomery County MUD #121 Board of Directors Meeting on 2026-01-19
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 2.0/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve Report on development in the District”
KA
Kimberly Avocato
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
JP
James Pell
Director, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
VF
Vicki Fullerton
Director, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
WB
William Bleibdrey
Director, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
SL
Sandi LaPlant
Director, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Report on development in the District. Texas Water Code Section 49.062(c) provides a process for qualified voters residing in the District to request the designation of a meeting place within the District. A description of this process can be found at: Water District Board Meeting Location Change Form (texas.gov) . Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 1 21 reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by Texas Government Code, Section 551.071 (Consultation wit h Attorney about Pending or Contemplated Litigation), Section 551.072 (Deliberations about Real Property), Section 551.073 (Deliberations abou t Gifts and Donations), Section 551.074 (Personnel Matters), Section 551.076 (Deliberations about Security Personnel or Devices), Section 551.086 (Economic Development), and Section 551.0761 (deliberation related to cybersecurity measure for critical infrastructure). P

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.0/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.