YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
22 • ResolutionsCity of Harker Heights (Bell County)

2. Council discussed and considered approving a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Harker

Presented in: CITY COUNCIL: Meeting - 13 Oct 2026 on 2026-10-13
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.3/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Motion on 2. Council discussed and considered approving a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Harker”
BB
Brian Burt
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
SH
Shane Hodyniak
Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
SH
Sam Halabi
Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
RF
Roxanne Flores
Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
MB
Michael Blomquist
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
JL
Jesse Lee Myles III
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Heights, Texas, authorizing execution of an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for an Intersection Improvement Project (Intersection and Operational Improvements (IOI) FM 3481 at Chaparral Road) and authorizing the City Manager to act and sign on behalf of the City in accordance with State Law. Trevor Jorgensen, Project Manager, made the presentation. Councilmember, Place 4 Roxanne Flores made a motion to approve Resolution 2026-28 of the City Council of the City of Harker Heights, Texas, authorizing execution of an Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for an Intersection Improvement Project (Intersection and Operational Improvements (IOI) FM 3481 at Chaparral Road) and authorizing the City Manager to act and sign on behalf of the City in accordance with State Law. Councilmember, Place 1 Brian Burt seconded the motion. Carried unanimously.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.3/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).