6. PUBLIC HEARINGS

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

(a) Public Hearing - the to amendments proposed To or receive comments for against Major Thoroughfare Plan of the Mobility Master Plan regarding Sienna area circulation. Agenda Item #5.a. Mayor Elackatt opened the public hearing to receive comments regarding proposed amendments to the Major Thoroughfare Plan related to Sienna area circulation. Elijah Gilbert, 3119 London Lane, Missouri City, spoke in opposition to the proposed plan. He expressed concern that routing additional traffic through residential streets would increase congestion and create safety risks, particularly for children. He noted that the streets were not designed to accommodate high traffic volumes and referenced traffic data to illustrate existing congestion levels. David Brammer, about citing proposal, the concerns also Rosharon, Road, Miller 2303 opposed roadway design. He stated that connecting a four -lane roadway to a two-lane road without proper infrastructure would create bottlenecks and increase the likelihood of accidents. Tiago Sal ies, 5222 New pointe Drive, Fresno, spoke against the proposal, emphasizing that Newpoint Drive is not designed to handle significant traffic increases. He expressed concern that the proposed and increase crime, would negatively impact neighborhood character, changes reduce property values. Camilo Contreras, 5111 Newpointe Drive, Fresno, opposed the proposal, citing the narrow roadway conditions and existing congestion. He expressed concern that additional would create traffic unsafe conditions and questioned previous planning decisions related to traffic management. Leslie Contreras, also of 5111 New pointe Drive, Fresno, expressed similar concerns, noting that the She increased about concerns raised navigate. difficult already and narrow are roadways to delays and safety risks at nearby intersections. Barry Brazil, 5019 Newpoint Drive, Fresno, spoke in opposition and stated that residential streets should not be used as major traffic routes. He recommended focusing on improvements to primary roadways rather than redirecting traffic through neighborhoods. William Nelly, 1910 Weatherby Lane, Fresno, provided comments regarding the feasibility of proposed roadway connections, noting potential conflicts with existing infrastructure and intersections. He questioned the practicality of the proposed design. Esther Dunn, 1918 Mossback Circle, Fresno, opposed the proposal, emphasizing safety concerns, lack of pedestrian infrastructure, and the potential negative impact on property values and quality of life. Ninan Mathew, 10007 Regal Bend Drive, Missouri City, acknowledged ongoing traffic issues within Sienna and expressed He causes. root the the proposal adequately would not that address advocated for more comprehensive, long-term solutions. City of the proposed amendments. He an overview Vincenzo Engineer Corazza presented future document a visionary intended to guide Major the ex