YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
19 • Public HearingCity of Pearland (Brazoria County)

1. Public Hearing: A request by Tarantino Properties, applicant, on behalf of

Presented in: City Council Regular Meeting - Oct 12 2026 on 2026-10-12
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.2/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (8 - 0)
“Motion on 1. Public Hearing: A request by Tarantino Properties, applicant, on behalf of”
QW
Quentin Wiltz
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
JK
Joseph Koza
Councilmember, Position 1 (Position 1)
YES
TE
Tommy Echols
Councilmember, Position 2 (Position 2)
YES
MC
Mona Chavarria
Councilmember, Position 3 (Position 3)
YES
CB
Clint Byrom
Councilmember, Position 4 (Position 4)
YES
LC
Layni Cade
Councilmember, Position 5 (Position 5)
YES
RF
Rick Fernandez
Councilmember, Position 6 (Position 6)
YES
RP
Rushi Patel
Councilmember, Position 7 (Position 7)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Pearland Business Park Business Opportunity 76, LLC., owner, for approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Studio – Tattoo or Body Piercing use on approximately 1.771 acres of land within the General Commercial (GC) District, to wit: Legal Description: A 1.771-acre tract in the Perry & Austin League, Abstract No. 111, Brazoria County, Texas, said 1.771-acre tract is part of Lots 8, 9 and 10 in the George W. Jenkins Subdivision as recorded in Volume 2, Page 20 in the Brazoria County Plat Records and is further described as being the remainder of a 2.8472-acre tract described in a deed to Barnett Drywall & Supply, Inc. as recorded in Volume 1384, Page 969 in the Brazoria County Deed Records. General Location: 1331 E. Broadway Street, Suite L, Pearland, Texas. Conditional Use Permit Application: CUP2026-0395 AIR-26-423 - Pdf

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.2/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).