Back to Docket Search
7. • ResolutionCity of Kaufman (Kaufman County)
Consider and take appropriate action on Resolution R-39-25, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, regarding Civil Rights Policies for the City of Kaufman, as Related to the Texas General Land Office Community Development Block Grant-Mitigation (CDBG-MIT) Resilient Community Program Under Contract Number 23-160-093-F090, and reaffirming the following policies: a. Citizens Participation Plan b. Excessive Force Policy c. Section 504 Policy and Grievance Procedures d. Secti
Presented in: City Council Meeting on 2025-11-17
Official Roll-Call Vote
Expands Gov't • 5.1/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Consider and take appropriate action on Resolution R-39-25, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, regarding Civil Rights Policies for the City of Kaufman, as Related to the Texas General Land Office Community Development Block Grant-Mitigation (CDBG-MIT) Resilient Community Program Under Contract Number 23-160-093-F090, and reaffirming the following policies: a. Citizens Participation Plan b. Excessive Force Policy c. Section 504 Policy and Grievance Procedures d. Secti”
JJ
Jeff Jordan
Mayor
YES
MP
Matthew Phillips
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JN
Jason Nelson
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
AL
Ashlea Longenecker
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
CG
Charles Gillenwater
Councilmember, Place 4
YES
LP
Lisa Parker
Councilmember, Place 5
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
This Resolution is required when accepting Federal Grants, i.e., CDBG programs. Nothing in this resolution and the attached policies conflicts with current city policies and/or procedures. This resolution pertains to a CDBG grant previously applied for by the City for the Comprehensive Plan updates.
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 5.1/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).