YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
10. • ResolutionCity of Kaufman (Kaufman County)

Consider and take appropriate action on Resolution R-36-25, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, accepting the preliminary service and assessment plan for authorized improvements within the Kaufman Public Improvement District No. 6; setting a date for a public hearing on the proposed levy of assessments; authorizing notice; and enacting other provisions relating thereto. (Enclave at Kings Fort)

Presented in: City Council Meeting on 2025-12-15
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Consider and take appropriate action on Resolution R-36-25, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, accepting the preliminary service and assessment plan for authorized improvements within the Kaufman Public Improvement District No. 6; setting a date for a public hearing on the proposed levy of assessments; authorizing notice; and enacting other provisions relating thereto. (Enclave at Kings Fort)”
JJ
YES
MP
Matthew Phillips
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JN
Jason Nelson
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
AL
Ashlea Longenecker
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
CG
Charles Gillenwater
Councilmember, Place 4
YES
LP
Lisa Parker
Councilmember, Place 5
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

This Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (PSAP) for consideration is for The Enclave at Kings Fort (Public Improvement District No. 6), as well as setting a public hearing for January 26, 2026, regarding the proposed levy of assessments. All stakeholders had the opportunity to review/edit this document to ensure compliance with statutes and the intent of the assessment levy.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).