YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
14. • ResolutionCity of Kaufman (Kaufman County)

Consider and take appropriate action on Resolution R-04-26, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, accepting the preliminary service and assessment plan for authorized improvements within the Kaufman Public Improvement District No. 6; setting a date for a public hearing on the proposed levy of assessments; authorizing notice; and enacting other provisions relating thereto. (Enclave at Kings Fort)

Presented in: City Council Meeting on 2026-02-23
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Consider and take appropriate action on Resolution R-04-26, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, accepting the preliminary service and assessment plan for authorized improvements within the Kaufman Public Improvement District No. 6; setting a date for a public hearing on the proposed levy of assessments; authorizing notice; and enacting other provisions relating thereto. (Enclave at Kings Fort)”
JJ
YES
MP
Matthew Phillips
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JN
Jason Nelson
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
AL
Ashlea Longenecker
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
CG
Charles Gillenwater
Councilmember, Place 4
YES
LP
Lisa Parker
Councilmember, Place 5
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Due to the cancellation of the January Regular City Council Meeting, the city must restart the process for this item. This Preliminary Service and Assessment Plan (PSAP) for consideration is for The Enclave at Kings Fort (Public Improvement District No. 6), as well as setting a public hearing for March 23, 2026, regarding the proposed levy of assessments. All stakeholders had the opportunity to review/edit this document to ensure compliance with statutes and the intent of the assessment levy.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).