YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
14. • OrdinanceCity of Kaufman (Kaufman County)

Consider and take appropriate action on Ordinance O-13-26, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, accepting and approving an Annual Service Plan Update and Assessment Roll 2026-2027 for the Kaufman Public Improvement District No. 1, in compliance with Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended; accepting and approving the Annual Service Plan Update and Updated Assessment Roll for PID 1, and including applicable TIRZ Credit Calculation, as set forth in Exh

Presented in: City Council Meeting on 2026-07-27
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Consider and take appropriate action on Ordinance O-13-26, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Kaufman, Texas, accepting and approving an Annual Service Plan Update and Assessment Roll 2026-2027 for the Kaufman Public Improvement District No. 1, in compliance with Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code, as amended; accepting and approving the Annual Service Plan Update and Updated Assessment Roll for PID 1, and including applicable TIRZ Credit Calculation, as set forth in Exh”
JJ
YES
MP
Matthew Phillips
Councilmember, Place 1
YES
JN
Jason Nelson
Councilmember, Place 2
YES
AL
Ashlea Longenecker
Councilmember, Place 3
YES
CG
Charles Gillenwater
Councilmember, Place 4
YES
LP
Lisa Parker
Councilmember, Place 5
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

This is the annual update to the Georgetown Service & Assessment Plan. Each property owner is identified in this plan and its corresponding assessment for Tax Year 2026 in accordance with the Public Improvement District #1 enabling ordinance.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).