YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
14 • OperationsTimber Lane Utility District (Harris County)

12. The Board considered the engineering contract. The engineer requested that

Presented in: Timber Lane Utility District Board Meeting - December 11, 2025 on 2025-12-11
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 4.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Board Action: 12. The Board considered the engineering contract. The engineer requested that”
EL
Eric Langstaff
Director, Place 3
YES
DM
Daniel Meacham
Director, Place 4
YES
JM
James Messer
Director, Place 5
YES
AG
A.F. Gessel
Director, Place 1
YES
RS
Robert Schenck
Director, Place 2
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

the Board approve a new fee schedule and update the terms and conditions of the contract. The attorney stated that she has some questions regarding the agreement terms and recommended that the Board table the contract for further discussion next month. The Board agreed to do so but

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 4.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.