Back to Docket Search
P-1 • Budget & FinanceCity of Tyler (Smith County)
Request that the City Council: 1) Consider receiving a presentation of the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Proposed Budget; 2) Consider voting to place proposals to adopt an ad valorem tax rate and adopt the final fiscal year 2024-2025 budget as action items for the September 11, 2024 City Council meeting, and; 3) Consider voting to schedule public hearings on the proposed property tax rate and the proposed budget on the agendas for the August 28, 2024 and September 11, 2024 City Council Meetings.
Presented in: City of Tyler City Council - August 14, 2024 on 2024-08-14
Official Roll-Call Vote
Expands Gov't • 8.7/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Request that the City Council: 1) Consider receiving a presentation of the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Proposed Budget; 2) Consider voting to place proposals to adopt an ad valorem tax rate and adopt the final fiscal year 2024-2025 budget as action items for the September 11, 2024 City Council meeting, and; 3) Consider voting to schedule public hearings on the proposed property tax rate and the proposed budget on the agendas for the August 28, 2024 and September 11, 2024 City Council Meetings.”
SH
Stuart Hene
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PH
Petra Hawkins
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
SM
Shonda Marsh
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
CC
Clint Childs
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
LN
Lloyd Nichols
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
CD
Carleen Dark-Bays
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Action item regarding Request that the City Council: 1) Consider receiving a presentation of the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Proposed Budget; 2) Consider voting to place proposals to adopt an ad valorem tax rate and adopt the fi
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 8.7/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).