Back to Docket Search
M-3 • ConsentCity of Tyler (Smith County)
Request that the City Council hold a final Public Hearing and consider approval of the FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and the HOME Investments Partnerships Program (HOME), including approval of the proposed budgets and funding allocations for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to approve Amendment #5 to the contract with Via Mo
Presented in: City of Tyler City Council - June 25, 2025 on 2025-06-25
Official Roll-Call Vote
Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Request that the City Council hold a final Public Hearing and consider approval of the FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and the HOME Investments Partnerships Program (HOME), including approval of the proposed budgets and funding allocations for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to approve Amendment #5 to the contract with Via Mo”
SH
Stuart Hene
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PH
Petra Hawkins
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
SM
Shonda Marsh
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
CC
Clint Childs
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
LN
Lloyd Nichols
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
CD
Carleen Dark-Bays
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Action item regarding Request that the City Council hold a final Public Hearing and consider approval of the FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and the HOME Investments
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.