YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
B-1 • ConsentCity of Tyler (Smith County)

Request that the City Council consider recommendations for appointment and re- appointment of members to the various City Boards. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a software licensing contract with Decision Optimization Technology - United States, L.P. (DOT-US), to provide the pavement management software solution for a three- year term for the total contract amount of $95,000.00. C-A-2 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the Cit

Presented in: City of Tyler City Council - September 10, 2025 on 2025-09-10
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Request that the City Council consider recommendations for appointment and re- appointment of members to the various City Boards. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to execute a software licensing contract with Decision Optimization Technology - United States, L.P. (DOT-US), to provide the pavement management software solution for a three- year term for the total contract amount of $95,000.00. C-A-2 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the Cit”
SH
Stuart Hene
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PH
Petra Hawkins
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
SM
Shonda Marsh
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
CC
Clint Childs
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
LN
Lloyd Nichols
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
CD
Carleen Dark-Bays
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Action item regarding Request that the City Council consider recommendations for appointment and re- appointment of members to the various City Boards. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider authorizing the City Mana

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.