YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
M-8 • ConsentCity of Tyler (Smith County)

Request that the City Council consider ratifying the agreement executed by the City Manager with Invoice Cloud for the provision of online and electronic payment processing services for the City of Tyler Water Business Office. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider reviewing and accepting the Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2025. C-A-2 Request that the City Council consider approving the 2025 Certified Property Tax Roll. C-A-3 Request that the City Council consider a

Presented in: City of Tyler City Council - December 10, 2025 on 2025-12-10
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Request that the City Council consider ratifying the agreement executed by the City Manager with Invoice Cloud for the provision of online and electronic payment processing services for the City of Tyler Water Business Office. C-A-1 Request that the City Council consider reviewing and accepting the Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2025. C-A-2 Request that the City Council consider approving the 2025 Certified Property Tax Roll. C-A-3 Request that the City Council consider a”
SH
Stuart Hene
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
PH
Petra Hawkins
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
SM
Shonda Marsh
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
CC
Clint Childs
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
LN
Lloyd Nichols
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
CD
Carleen Dark-Bays
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Action item regarding Request that the City Council consider ratifying the agreement executed by the City Manager with Invoice Cloud for the provision of online and electronic payment processing services for the City of Ty

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.