Back to Docket Search
4 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)
[2026-138] Consider a resolution: (1) amending Capital Improvement Program budgets as detailed in the Resolution and Fiscal Impact; (2) approving Amendment No. 2 to the Predevelopment Agreement with Hunt Development Group, LLC, for the Downtown Redevelopment Project: (a) providing for additional pre- development services including demolition, mixed-use development marketing, and strategic plan update services; and (b) increasing the contract by $1,694,490.00 (so the new total amount does not exc
Presented in: City of Waco: Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-03-17
Official Roll-Call Vote
Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-138] Consider a resolution: (1) amending Capital Improvement Program budgets as detailed in the Resolution and Fiscal Impact; (2) approving Amendment No. 2 to the Predevelopment Agreement with Hunt Development Group, LLC, for the Downtown Redevelopment Project: (a) providing for additional pre- development services including demolition, mixed-use development marketing, and strategic plan update services; and (b) increasing the contract by $1,694,490.00 (so the new total amount does not exc”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Waco City Council Item 4: Consider a resolution: (1) amending Capital Improvement Program budgets as detailed in the Resolution and Fiscal Impact; (2) approving Amendment No. 2 to the Predevelopment Agreement with Hunt Develop
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.