Back to Docket Search
1 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)
[2026-172] Conduct a public hearing and consider a resolution approving an amendment to the Final Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) Plan for the Lot 9, Block 5 portion of the Saddle Creek PUD, to allow alternatives to the required eight-foot "masonry wall" along the north property line of the property addressed as 10001 China Spring Road, originally passed by Resolution No. 2025-172, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any documents in connection therewith. (Case Z-26-02 Amir
Presented in: City of Waco: Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-03-17
Official Roll-Call Vote
Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-172] Conduct a public hearing and consider a resolution approving an amendment to the Final Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) Plan for the Lot 9, Block 5 portion of the Saddle Creek PUD, to allow alternatives to the required eight-foot "masonry wall" along the north property line of the property addressed as 10001 China Spring Road, originally passed by Resolution No. 2025-172, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any documents in connection therewith. (Case Z-26-02 Amir ”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Waco City Council Item 1: Conduct a public hearing and consider a resolution approving an amendment to the Final Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) Plan for the Lot 9, Block 5 portion of the Saddle Creek PUD, to allow alternativ
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.