Back to Docket Search
4 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)
[2026-328] Consider an ordinance: (1) authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with WBW Single Development Group, LLC – Series 110 (“WBW”) for the Warren Road Extension Improvement Project, to allow the City to participate in the total cost of oversizing roadway improvements required by the City to provide for existing and future capacity along said road and to reimburse WBW in an amount not to exceed $228,277.10, to be paid in accordance with the terms of the Ordinance; and (2) authorizi
Presented in: City of Waco: 5/19 Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-05-19
Official Roll-Call Vote
Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-328] Consider an ordinance: (1) authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with WBW Single Development Group, LLC – Series 110 (“WBW”) for the Warren Road Extension Improvement Project, to allow the City to participate in the total cost of oversizing roadway improvements required by the City to provide for existing and future capacity along said road and to reimburse WBW in an amount not to exceed $228,277.10, to be paid in accordance with the terms of the Ordinance; and (2) authorizi”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Waco City Council Item 4: Consider an ordinance: (1) authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with WBW Single Development Group, LLC – Series 110 (“WBW”) for the Warren Road Extension Improvement Project, to allow the C
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.