YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
3 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)

[2026-372] Consider a resolution approving an encroachment agreement between the City of Waco and Brazos River Ventures, LLC, for the installation of a monument sign within an approximately 0.0046 acre (200 sq. ft.) encroachment tract of the 20-foot City of Waco utility easement at 401 Sheehy Parkway, more particularly described in the exhibits to the agreement, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any documents in connection therewith. (E-26-02 Brazos River Ventures, LLC) (Di

Presented in: City of Waco: 6/16 Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-06-16
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-372] Consider a resolution approving an encroachment agreement between the City of Waco and Brazos River Ventures, LLC, for the installation of a monument sign within an approximately 0.0046 acre (200 sq. ft.) encroachment tract of the 20-foot City of Waco utility easement at 401 Sheehy Parkway, more particularly described in the exhibits to the agreement, and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any documents in connection therewith. (E-26-02 Brazos River Ventures, LLC) (Di”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Waco City Council Item 3: Consider a resolution approving an encroachment agreement between the City of Waco and Brazos River Ventures, LLC, for the installation of a monument sign within an approximately 0.0046 acre (200 sq.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.