Back to Docket Search
4 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)
[2026-373] Consider a resolution: (1) terminating the Encroachment Agreement (Contract No. E-24-03) (subject of Resolution No. 2024- 934) with Kamila Kay Schauer and James Alan Schauer (“Property Owners”) for a residential structure at Lot 22, Block “O” of the Jordan’s South Side Addition, Volume 275, Page 258, Deed Records of McLennan County, Texas, in the City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas, known as 2001 South 9th Street (“Property”); (2) approving an Easement Agreement with the Property Own
Presented in: City of Waco: 6/16 Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-06-16
Official Roll-Call Vote
Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-373] Consider a resolution: (1) terminating the Encroachment Agreement (Contract No. E-24-03) (subject of Resolution No. 2024- 934) with Kamila Kay Schauer and James Alan Schauer (“Property Owners”) for a residential structure at Lot 22, Block “O” of the Jordan’s South Side Addition, Volume 275, Page 258, Deed Records of McLennan County, Texas, in the City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas, known as 2001 South 9th Street (“Property”); (2) approving an Easement Agreement with the Property Own”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Waco City Council Item 4: Consider a resolution: (1) terminating the Encroachment Agreement (Contract No. E-24-03) (subject of Resolution No. 2024- 934) with Kamila Kay Schauer and James Alan Schauer (“Property Owners”) for a
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.