YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
3 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)

[2026-416] Consider an ordinance authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with Arbor Rose Capital Fund II, LLC (“ARCF”), owner of 5803 Legend Lake Parkway (which is Lot 13 Block 1 of Legends Crossing Addition), for the Legend Lake Parkway Drainage Channel Project, to allow the City to participate in the total cost of oversizing of (drainage) improvements required by the City to provide adequate existing and future capacity in the area and to reimburse ARCF in an amount not to exceed $576,

Presented in: City of Waco: 6/16 Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-06-16
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-416] Consider an ordinance authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with Arbor Rose Capital Fund II, LLC (“ARCF”), owner of 5803 Legend Lake Parkway (which is Lot 13 Block 1 of Legends Crossing Addition), for the Legend Lake Parkway Drainage Channel Project, to allow the City to participate in the total cost of oversizing of (drainage) improvements required by the City to provide adequate existing and future capacity in the area and to reimburse ARCF in an amount not to exceed $576,”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Waco City Council Item 3: Consider an ordinance authorizing a Developer Participation Agreement with Arbor Rose Capital Fund II, LLC (“ARCF”), owner of 5803 Legend Lake Parkway (which is Lot 13 Block 1 of Legends Crossing Addi

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.