YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
4 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)

[2026-498] Consider a resolution approving the second of two, one-year renewals of a contract with Greater Waco Collective Impact Initiative, a/k/a Prosper Waco, in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00, to provide logistical support, coordination, and leadership to develop a shared measurement and evaluation system in support of behavioral health and the initiative known as the Behavioral Health Leadership Team, and authorizing the City Manager or their designee to execute any documents in connec

Presented in: City of Waco: Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-08-18
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-498] Consider a resolution approving the second of two, one-year renewals of a contract with Greater Waco Collective Impact Initiative, a/k/a Prosper Waco, in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00, to provide logistical support, coordination, and leadership to develop a shared measurement and evaluation system in support of behavioral health and the initiative known as the Behavioral Health Leadership Team, and authorizing the City Manager or their designee to execute any documents in connec”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Waco City Council Item 4: Consider a resolution approving the second of two, one-year renewals of a contract with Greater Waco Collective Impact Initiative, a/k/a Prosper Waco, in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00, to provid

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.