Back to Docket Search
Item 9.D. • ACTIONCanyon Regional Water Authority (Guadalupe County)
Discuss, consider, and take possible action on Resolution 26-02-006 accepting nominations for a
Presented in: CRWA Board of Trustees Meeting - February 09, 2026 on 2026-02-09
Official Roll-Call Vote
Expands Gov't • 2.8/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Trustee Scheel made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 25-01-008: (i) approving terms and conditions for settlement of claims asserted against CRWA in Cause No. 25-0782-CV-E; City of San Marcos vs. Canyon Regional Water Authority, County Line Special Utility District, Crystal Clear Special Utility District, Maxwell Special Utility District and Martindale Water Supply Corporation ; Pending in the 456th District Court of Guadalupe County, Texas; (ii) authorizing the General Manager to issue payment of the settlement amount to the City of Sa n Marcos; and (iii) delegating auth ority to the Board President to execute such documents as are necessary to effectuate settlement, subject to ratification by the Board of Trustees at its next meeting. Trustee Scheel correc ted the Resolution number to 26-01-008 (from her original stated number of 25-01-008). Trustee Steubing seconded the motion. President Rohan called for a vote. The motion passed with sixteen (16) Ayes.”
JF
James Forssell
Director, Place 3
YES
SG
Stephanie Gonzalez
Director, Place 4
YES
MP
Martin Poore
Director, Place 5
YES
SM
Shari McDaniel
Director, Place 1
YES
MV
Mabel Vaughn
Director, Place 2
YES
TF
Timothy Fousse
Board President
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
CRWA Representative to be appointed to the Alliance regional Water Authority Board of Directors, and appointing a Representative selected by vote of the CRWA Board of Trustees
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.8/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).