Cockrell Investment Partners, L.P. v. Middle Pecos Groundwater
Official Roll-Call Vote
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
D. Cockrell Investment Partners, L.P. v. Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District, Cause No. P-8626-83-CV (83% District Court)(Cockrell IV); and In Cockrell IV, the lawsuit was filed on August 17" and served on September 13" by agreement. The District's answer and counterclaim were timely filed October 9". FSH has advised that it will intervene and file plea to the jurisdiction. Cockrell filed Plaintiffs First Amended Petition on August 5, 2024. Remains pending without further action. Parties are waiting for ruling from the Texas Supreme Court in Cockrell | and Cockrell Il. E. Cockrell Investment Partners, L.P. v. Middle Pecos Groundwater Conservation District, Cause No. P-13031-112-CV (112 District Court)(Cockrell V). In Cockrell V, the lawsuit was filed on August 23" and served on September 13" by agreement. The District's answer and counterclaim were timely filed October 9". FSH has advised that it will intervene and file plea to the jurisdiction. Cockrell filed Plaintiff's First Amended Petition on August 5, 2024. Remains pending without further action. Parties are waiting for ruling from the Texas Supreme Court in Cockrell | and Cockrell I. Page 6 of 7 Minutes of 08-18-2025 XVI Xvil XvIll XIX M.R. en ecretaryiT reasurer Briefing on U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s five-year review of Pecos Gambusia and related issues regarding Diamond Y Springs. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species ESA (ESA) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, USFWS then recommends whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. USFWS's original listing as endangered or threatened is based on the species’ status considering the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA. These same five factors are considered in any subsequent reclassification or delisting decisions. In the 5-year review, USFWS considered the best available scientific and commercial data on the species and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If USFWS recommends a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, it must propose to do so through a separate rulemaking process including public review and comment. Progress Reports: Well Registrations, Production Permits, Drilling Permits, Data Loggers, Drought Monitor Map, Water Quality Analysis, and General Manager’s Correspondence. e Pecos County Drought Map for July and August 2025. Most of the County is out of Drought but Abnormally dry. 4 H Water Ambassadors program. Gave the 4H kids a tour of Pecos County GMA 7 08-14-2025 Williams Monthly Usage Reports Rig Data Report 08-09-2025. 1 Rig drilling in Pecos County TPWMA Forecast 08-18-2025 PB Materials Surface Water Deal Directors’ Comments and consider and/or act upon agenda for next meeting. Next Board meetings will be August 26" at 5:30 pm (Tax Rate Hearing) and September 16" (Regular Board meeting). Adjourn Board meeting. Wayne Tinkler made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Jeff Sims Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 11:29 a.m. KH pg lor, Groth, President Date Approved Ze2 Page 7 of 7 Minutes of 08-18-2025
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 4.3/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).