YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
1 • GeneralCalhoun County Groundwater Conservation District (Calhoun County)

Enforcement Case Violation - ECV-20250425-0.

Presented in: Calhoun County GCD Board of Directors Meeting - October 27, 2025 on 2025-10-27
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Action on Enforcement Case Violation - ECV-20250425-0.”
MH
Mike Hahn
Board Treasurer, Precinct 4
YES
SD
Steven Dierschke
Director, Precinct 1
YES
DM
Danny May
Director, Place 3
YES
GJ
Galen Johnson
Director, Place 4
YES
CB
Clay Brett
Director, Place 5
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

1. Enforcement Case Violation - ECV-20250425-0. Enforcement Case Violation - ECV-20250425-02 Enforcement Case Violation - ECV-20250425-03 Enforcement Case Violation - ECV-20: = Topic 3.2 - Failures to Report Groundwater Production for CY2024 re Group 1 x WN Mr. Andruss explained: On April 25, 2025, the compliance specialist of the District initiated 4 enforcement case violations related to potential failures to report groundwater production for calendar year 2024. Of the four potential violations, three of the violations are associated with persons without previous violations of Rule 4.2. As of July 21, 2025, the alleged violators associated with the four enforcement case violations have achieved compliance by submitting groundwater production reports for the associated wells for CY2024. Groundwater Enforcement Case . . ee Production Report Date Received Violation cy2024 ECV-20250425-02 GPR-20250606-01 June 5, 2025 ECV-20250425-03 GPR-20250718-01 July 18, 2025 GPR-20250514-01 ECV-20250425-04 May 13, 2025 GPR-20250514-02 Rule 11.10: PENALTIES of the Rules of the District, adopted on October 17, 2024 read as follows (emphasis added): Rule 11.10: PENALTIES CCGCD - Meeting Packet - February 2, 2026 - Supplemental Documentation | Page 52 of 142

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.