YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
12 • Action ItemsROOSEVELT ISD (Lubbock County)

Consider and possible approval of Resolution to conduct a joint election on May 2, 2026, with all cities and schools with territory inside Lubbock County that may require a May 2, 2026, election. Tomar en consideración y posiblemente aprobar la Resolución para llevar a cabo una elección conjunta el 2 de mayo de 2026, con todas las ciudades y escuelas con territorio dentro del Condado de Lubbock qu

Presented in: ROOSEVELT ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-01-19
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 2.6/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on Consider and possible approval of Resolution to conduct a joint election on May 2, 2026, with all cities and schools with territory inside Lubbock County that may require a May 2, 2026, election. Toma”
CH
Casey Hildebrandt
Trustee, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
BW
Brad Welch
Trustee, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES
MW
Marty Whetzel
Trustee, Place 7 (Place 7)
YES
JW
James Warnock
Trustee, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
CS
Chris Shultz
Trustee, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
MV
Monte Vineyard
Trustee, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
JG
Joseph Grizzell
Trustee, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

12. Consider and possible approval of Resolution to conduct a joint election on May 2, 2026, with all cities and schools with territory inside Lubbock County that may require a May 2, 2026, election. Tomar en consideración y posiblemente aprobar la Resolución para llevar a cabo una elección conjunta el 2 de mayo de 2026, con todas las ciudades y escuelas con territorio dentro del Condado de Lubbock que puedan requerir una elección el 2 de mayo de 2026.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.6/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.