Back to Docket Search
23. • REGULAR AGENDACity of Abilene (Taylor County)
<span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Resolution:</span></strong> Receive a Report, Hold a Discussion and Public Hearing, and Take Action on Approving a Settlement Agreement, Patricia Anderson v. City of Abilene, Cause No. 51867-A, In the 42nd Judicial District Court, Taylor County, Texas <strong><em><u>(Stanley Smith)</u></em></strong></span>
Presented in: City of Abilene City Council Meeting on 2026-08-27
Official Roll-Call Vote
Restrains Gov't • 4.4/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve <span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Resolution:</span></strong> Receive a Report, Hold a Discussion and Public Hearing, and Take Action on Approving a Settlement Agreement, Patricia Anderson v. City of Abilene, Cause No. 51867-A, In the 42nd Judicial District Court, Taylor County, Texas <strong><em><u>(Stanley Smith)</u></em></strong></span>”
WH
Weldon Hurt
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
SP
Shane Price
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
LB
Lynn Beard
Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
BR
Blaise Regan
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
BL
Benjamin L. Bailey
Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
ME
Miguel Espinoza
Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
TC
Travis Craver
Councilmember, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
<span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Resolution:</span></strong> Receive a Report, Hold a Discussion and Public Hearing, and Take Action on Approving a Settlement Agreement, Patricia Anderson v. City of Abilene, Cause No. 51867-A, In the 42nd Judicial District Court, Taylor County, Texas <strong><em><u>(Stanley Smith)</u></em></strong></span>
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 4.4/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.