Rebuttal – The applicant concluded their remarks by stating that they will comply
Official Roll-Call Vote
Staff Report & Agenda Item Details
Rebuttal – The applicant concluded their remarks by stating that they will comply with any terms of the permit amendments, if they are granted by the Board. The Board asked closing questions to the applicant, and two members of the public requested the opportunity to speak before the closing of the hearing. Rojelio Medina had submitted a hearing registration form to appear as a non-party to provide sworn testimony. Once the form was located (in the District email spam folder), Mr. Medina Page 3 of 5 GCGCD Minutes April 9, 2026 was offered an opportunity to speak after it was confirmed that he was sworn in. Ms. Peach and Ms. Bush responded to the individual. Julian Sepulveda did not get an opportunity to speak when other individuals with party status were providing statements and evidence. Mr. Sepulveda provided his statement. Before the adjournment of the permit hearing, GCGCD’s legal counsel, the applicant, Ms. Bush, Mr. Beach, and Ms. Peach provided explanations to questions posed by the Board. F. ADJOURMENT of permit hearing – Motion to adjourn the permit hearing by Matt Miranda. Second by Jamie Nielson. Board voted in favor of adjournment, and Mr. Starcke adjourned the permit hearing at 7:34 PM. REGULAR MEETING All agenda items listed below will be considered for discussion and/or action at said meeting. CALL TO ORDER – Mr. Starcke called the meeting to order at 7:47 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE DETERMINE A QUORUM – verified.
Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis
This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.