YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
G) • GeneralCity of New Braunfels (Comal County)

Discuss and consider approval of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of “City of New Braunfels, Texas, Utility System Revenue Bonds, Taxable Series 2026A (Texas Water Development Board - Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Lead Service Line Replacement Program)”; Pledging the Net Revenues of the City’s Waterworks, Sanitary Sewer and Electric Light and Power Systems to the Payment of the Principa

Presented in: City of New Braunfels City Council Meeting on 2026-05-11
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 9.3/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“approved”
TC
Toni Carter
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
MC
Michael Capizzi
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
DL
D. Lee Edwards
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
LS
Lawrence Spradley
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
MA
Mary Ann Labowski
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Discuss and consider approval of an Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of “City of New Braunfels, Texas, Utility System Revenue Bonds, Taxable Series 2026A (Texas Water Development Board - Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Lead Service Line Replacement Program)”; Pledging the Net Revenues of the City’s Waterworks, Sanitary Sewer and Electric Light and Power Systems to the Payment of the Principal of and Interest on Said Bonds; Specifying the Terms and Conditions of Such Bonds; Resolving Other Matters Incident and Related to the Issuance, Payment, Security, Sale and Delivery of Said Bonds, Including the Approval and Execution of a Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement and an Escrow Agreement; and Providing an Effective Date.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 9.3/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).