<p style="margin-left:0in;" data-pasted="true">A Resolution Reallocating Funding From The Glenview Project To The Booth Calloway Project; Eliminating The Larger Glenview Project At This Time; Directing Staff To Proceed With A Lower-Cost Glenview Mill And Overlay Approach Through Tarrant County With Sewer Line Pipe Bursting Evaluated As Needed; Authorizing The City Manager Or Designee To Update Pro

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

<h2 style="margin-left:0in;" data-pasted="true">1. Decision Requested</h2><p style="margin-left:0in;">Staff is requesting that the City Council authorize staff to eliminate the Glenview project at this time, move the funding originally allocated for Glenview to Booth Calloway, and proceed with a lower-cost Glenview mill and overlay partnership with Tarrant County, with sewer line pipe bursting evaluated as needed.</p><p style="margin-left:0in;">The decision before Council is whether to redirect limited project funding to Booth Calloway while addressing Glenview through a more limited maintenance approach.</p><h2 style="margin-left:0in;">2. Executive Summary</h2><p style="margin-left:0in;">This item is before Council because the City must prioritize limited capital and bond funding within the five-year CIP and budget stabilization framework. Staff recommends moving the funding originally allocated for Glenview to Booth Calloway because Booth Calloway is the higher-priority project at this time.</p><p style="margin-left:0in;">Glenview would not be ignored. Instead, staff would eliminate the larger Glenview project at this time and coordinate with Tarrant County on a mill and overlay approach, while evaluating sewer line pipe bursting if utility conditions require it.</p><p style="margin-left:0in;">If approved, staff will update the project funding plan, coordinate with Tarrant County, and bring back any required agreements, amendments, or utility-related actions.</p><h2 style="margin-left:0in;">3. Background</h2><p style="margin-left:0in;">The City previously considered funding for Glenview. Since then, the five-year financial forecast and CIP review have shown the need to prioritize projects more tightly.</p><p style="margin-left:0in;">Booth Calloway has emerged as the recommended use of the available Tarrant County bond funding, while Glenview may be addressed more affordably through a mill and overlay strategy and targeted utility work if needed.</p><div style="margin-left:0in;"><ul style="list-style-type: disc;margin-left: -0.25in;"><li style="margin-left:0in;">This action redirects funding rather than adding a new funding source.</li><li style="margin-left:0in;">This action removes the larger Glenview project from the current funding plan.</li><li style="margin-left:0in;">This action allows Glenview to remain on the maintenance radar through a county mill and overlay approach.</li><li style="margin-left:0in;">Sewer line pipe bursting should be evaluated before or in connection with the street work if needed to avoid rework.</li></ul></div><h2 style="margin-left:0in;">4. Key Facts</h2><div style="margin-left:0in;"><ul style="list-style-type: disc;margin-left: -0.25in;"><li style="margin-left:0in;">Current condition: Funding had been allocated or contemplated for Glenview, but staff now recommends moving that funding to Booth Calloway.</li><li style="margin-left:0in;">Need or opportunity: The City can align limited funding with the higher-priori

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.2/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.