YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
D.5 • WATER_DISTRICTEdwards Aquifer Authority (Bexar County)

Consider recommendation from the Finance/Administrative Committee to approve the Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan FY2026 Funding Applications submitted by the Edwards Aquifer Authority ($18,162,608), the City of New Braunfels ($1,027,495), and th

Presented in: Edwards Aquifer Authority - Finance/Administrative Committee (October 28, 2025) on 2025-10-28
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.7/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (2 - 0)
“A motion was made by Director Hoyt, seconded by Secretary Sanborn, the Finance/Administrative Committee recommend the board adopt a resolution and order of the Edwards Aquifer Authority Board of Directors approving the Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan FY2026 Program Funding Applications submitted by the Edwards Aquifer Authority, in an amount not to exceed $18,162,608; the City of New Bra”
RS
Rachel Sanborn
Director, District 1 (District 1)
YES
MH
Matthew Hoyt
Director, District 9 (District 9)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

A motion was made by Director Hoyt, seconded by Secretary Sanborn, the Finance/Administrative Committee recommend the board adopt a resolution and order of the Edwards Aquifer Authority Board of Directors approving the Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan FY2026 Program Funding Applications submitted by the Edwards Aquifer Authority, in an amount not to exceed $18,162,608; the City of New Braunfels, in an amount not to exceed $1,027,495; and the City of San Marcos/Texas State University, in an amount not to exceed $616,600, for the purpose of implementing the Conservation Measures and Program Activities as required by the EAHCP, for the period January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. The motion passed without opposition.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.7/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).