YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
IX.E • Action ItemsFLORENCE ISD (Williamson County)

Consideration and Possible Action to Approve a Rate for Payment for Accumulated Leave Upon Retirement Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: In 2025, the Board approved a revision to policy DEC(LOCAL) allowing for payment at a rate determined by the board for local accumulated leave. At the time this was approved, the board discussed paying $75 per accumulated local leave day, assuming the retir

Presented in: FLORENCE ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-07-20
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.1/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on Consideration and Possible Action to Approve a Rate for Payment for Accumulated Leave Upon Retirement Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: In 2025, the Board approved a revision to policy DEC(LOCA”
AD
Anthony Deaugustineo
Trustee, Place 5
YES
CG
Charles Giddens
Trustee, Place 6
YES
JS
Jeff Stone
Trustee, Place 7
YES
EN
Ed Navarette
Trustee, Place 1
YES
JA
Jt Atkinson
Trustee, Place 2
YES
JE
Jason Earp
Trustee, Place 3
YES
PB
Pete Burson
Trustee, Place 4
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

IX.E. Consideration and Possible Action to Approve a Rate for Payment for Accumulated Leave Upon Retirement Presenter: Rick Kirkpatrick Description: In 2025, the Board approved a revision to policy DEC(LOCAL) allowing for payment at a rate determined by the board for local accumulated leave. At the time this was approved, the board discussed paying $75 per accumulated local leave day, assuming the retiree met all requirements set forth in the policy. At this time, we need to set the rate for the upcoming school year. This rate will remain in place until the board makes a change. I recommend staying with the original $75 per accumulated local leave day.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.1/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).