YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
16 • REGULARMontgomery County Municipal Utility District #95 (Montgomery County)

Consideration of matters for possible placement on future agendas

Presented in: Montgomery County MUD #95 Board of Directors Meeting on 2026-04-08
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (6 - 0)
“Motion to approve Consideration of matters for possible placement on future agendas”
AH
Asa Hoffman
President
YES
KR
Kari Romano
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
DP
Debbie Pilcher
Director, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
JS
Jack Seitzinger
Director, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
ME
Martin Etwop
Director, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES
RS
Ray Schmidt
Director, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Consideration of matters for possible placement on future agendas.17. -3 - 844810vl Reconvene in Open Session and authorize any action resulting from matters discussed in Closed Session; and Closed Session pursuant to Texas Government Code (Open Meetings Act), including but not limited to Section 551.071 (for consultation with the District's attorney), 551.072 (deliberation regarding real property) and/or 551.076 (security matters); Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and would like to request auxiliary aids or services are requested to contact the District's attorney at (713) 623-4531 at least three business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. SXG Q M ERYCZ, 0 . SCHWARTZ, PAGE & HARDING, L.L.P. B 4Z olQ Q Spencer W. Creed • Attorneys for the District Discuss items of community interest and prioritization of initiatives; (a) Potential sites for additional recreational improvements; consider proposal for lighting improvements at

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).