YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
1 • Regular AgendaCity of Kyle (Hays County)

Receive a report, hold a discussion, and provide staff direction regarding the Budget

Presented in: City Council Special Meeting - July 16, 2026 on 2026-07-16
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve Item #1: Receive a report, hold a discussion, and provide staff direction regarding the Budget”
YF
Yvonne Flores-Cale
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
CG
Courtney Goza
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
MM
Melisa Medina
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
CZ
Claudia Zapata
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
DL
Dr. Lauralee Harris
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
MM
Marc McKinney
Councilmember, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
MT
Michael Tobias
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Receive a report, hold a discussion, and provide staff direction regarding the Budget Performance Report for the nine-month period ending June 30, 2026, for the City’s four major operating funds, including: Review budget status for revenues, expenditures, and fund balances as of June 30, 2026, for the City's General Fund, Water Utility Fund, Wastewater Utility Fund, and Storm Drainage Utility Fund. Review estimated savings anticipated from the cost-containment measures implemented by the Interim City Manager to begin mitigating the combined projected deficit of $14.2 million in the City’s General Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The projected deficit results from a lower than budgeted beginning fund balance, revenues projected to be below budgeted levels, and a resulting fund balance projected to be below the City’s minimum required reserve level, as previously presented to the City Council on May 16, 2026.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.